Does Geo-Blocking Still Matter in a Borderless Internet?

April 16, 2025 By Nancy William No Comments 5 minutes

The internet is considered to have no boundaries, granting users access to content from all over the world. Users should have access to communicate freely across different platforms without any restrictions. However, due to its illusions, user experience differs from what is shown on advertisements; geo-blocking is one of them.

Geo-Blocking in a Borderless Internet

Geo-blocking is a function that restricts access to a website or a portion of website depending on the geographical location of the visitor. As a consequence, it does not unlock doors to vividly new markets, but separates users into a series of digitally blocked zones. Is geo-blocking relevant, especially in 2025 given the increased demand for borderless access to technology?

Note: VPNs are legal if you are not using them to engage in malicious activities. A VPN enables you to access global content, such as Netflix’s global content. We recommend using a reliable VPN that ensures access to geo-limited content, along with improved privacy online.

Get FastestVPN

Reasons Why Geo-blocking Needs to Be Implemented

Multiple media are being escoshed because some rational geo-blocking deals with important economic and social aspects strive to balance these two extremes.

Movies and streaming media is one example where geo-blocking applies also called a licensing cap. For South America or Europe parts, content may not be licensed to existence. Streaming and digital stores rapidly increase their invention and profit, however as a consequence, region specific access or restrictions to sell online stores is greatly encouraged.

Governments also play a role. Certain regimes implement geo-blocking to censor content, limit political dissent, or enforce social norms. In these cases, access isn’t limited by a company’s decision, but by law.

Even in democratic countries, digital services use geo-blocking to comply with local regulations, such as online gambling laws or financial restrictions. That’s where the conversation gets more complex.

User Frustration and the Borderless Expectation

Users have a singular expectation: The internet is a coherent environment. When a user travels abroad and suddenly a streaming service experiences an error, or worse, a website shows a “Not available in your region” banner, it leaves users feeling disenfranchised. This is more delicate for digital nomads, expats, or even tourists – anyone who tends to move places expecting reliable service.

Geo-blocking can even prevent users from accessing paid-for services. For instance, subscribing to a service in your country only to later discover it’s ziplocked during your business trip abroad. Such difficulties have resulted in numerous users attempting to seek alternatives.

Online Gambling: A Case Study in Digital Borders

Online gambling highlights geo-blocking’s inconsistencies more than most sectors.

Casino platforms must follow strict licensing laws. Some countries prohibit all forms of online betting. Others allow it under state-run monopolies. And in many places, regulation is still evolving. The result? A scattered map of availability, where access depends more on location than intent.

Yet, demand doesn’t recognize borders. Many users want the freedom to explore international platforms that offer better odds, more diverse games, or stronger consumer protections. That’s why comparison platforms have grown in popularity, helping users access all foreign casinos by showing where each site operates legally and what each jurisdiction allows.

For players, this isn’t just about fun. It’s about finding a transparent, regulated environment that fits their preferences—even if that means looking beyond national borders.

Workarounds Are Weakening Geo-Blocking

Users are increasingly turning to tools that bypass location-based restrictions. VPNs (Virtual Private Networks), proxy servers, and smart DNS services now make it easy to appear as though you’re accessing the web from another country.

According to recent surveys, over 30% of internet users have used a VPN at least once, and a significant portion rely on them regularly to overcome geo-blocking.

These tools are legal in most countries and are often used for privacy as much as access. But they also expose a key weakness in geo-blocking: it’s easy to circumvent.

In practice, this means the effectiveness of geo-blocking is declining. Companies invest in complex detection systems, but tech-savvy users almost always stay a step ahead.

The Legal and Ethical Debate

Supporters of geo-blocking argue that it protects intellectual property, enforces local laws, and enables businesses to operate efficiently within jurisdictional boundaries. For example, an online gambling company may only be licensed in the EU, making geo-blocking essential to avoid illegal activity elsewhere.

But critics claim that it breaks down consumer rights. Access to the internet is now fundamental, and restricting an individual’s access feels more like exclusion than regulation. Within the 2European Union, there are ongoing court disputes attempting to determine the boundaries of geo-blocking within the Digital Single Market.

Lawful compliance may be justified for some restrictions; however, a lack of distinction leads to over-blocking even for law abiding users.

Does Geo-Blocking Still Have Justification in the Year 2025?

An overnight disappearance of geo-blocking is highly unlikely, but its reasoning is becoming less stable. Users expect worldwide access, circumventing methods are easily accessible, and in certain sectors such as streaming, gaming, and online casinos, blocking users by location increasingly looks out of date.

The difficulty comes with creating regulations. Some, for example, support the idea of international licensing which would allow access regardless of the user’s location. This allows for better compliance than the more restrictive location based access.

Conclusion

For the time being, people will continue searching for methods to bypass restrictions, while businesses must decide if geo-restrictions are still beneficial or if aligning with a borderless internet is the better option.